Revisiting the Mommy Track - the generation that has it all? "by Jane Bryant Quinn, July 17, 2000, for Newsweek Magazine."
"Jane Bryant Quinn, best-selling author of "Making the Most of Your
Money," published by Simon and Schuster."
Prosperity and higher pay for their jobs are leaving women free NOT to
work. Average wages are rising, employers are beating the bushes for hires.
There's more flexibility and equity in the workplace. As you might expect, these attractions are changing women's approach to work. But are they piling into the welcoming job market? No, they're edging
out. A rising proportion of young women appear to be choosing motherhood over
career.
It's one of prosperity's side effects. When couples feel they need two
incomes to survive, more moms lean toward full-time paying jobs. When
they can manage on just one income (or one and a half), they lean toward
part-time work or staying home full time. A few dads do, too, but it's
predominantly moms.
Many mothers, of course, choose to keep working, to maintain their incomes
or careers. Of those 36 to 40, more than 40 percent work all year in
full-time paying jobs - double the number 30 years ago. Other mothers
have always stayed home or chosen flexible "mommy track" jobs.
But there's a palpable shift - led, as usual, by the boomers. In the
1960s, when women first muscled into the work force, at-home moms all but
apologized for what they did. But once those same boomer women started
families (often late in their 30s), staying home with the kids became the
preferred thing to do.
Like their mothers, these women are adopting traditional roles - investing
in their husbands' careers rather than their own. Unlike their mothers
(and thanks to the feminist achievement), they don't feel trapped. "A lot
of women my age don't feel a big need to work because they know they can
if they want to," says Kate Francisco, 32, or Langhorne, Pa., a mother of
two.